Monday, 28 December 2009

Festive Wine Tasting


Another eclectic wine tasting, with the main focus on Italy (Piemonte, to be precise).


La Buxynoise Montagny Premier Cru 2001 (Burgundy, France)
16.5-17/20
Bought from the winery some years ago. Medium gold, open nose with some developed (but not fully mature) Chardonnay characters. A touch tropical, a touch mineral. Ample, full palate, well balanced. Lovely, strong, medium-length finish. Mature, but perhaps a touch short of its peak. I would chance keeping another bottle 2-3 years more.

This is their best white Montagny. I’ve had some old Montagny Premier Cru wines this good (if not better) from La Buxynoise before, but also some real stinkers – corked, aged and just wrong (all bought at the winery). But when it gets this good I can forgive them. Value for money, this wine is hard to beat in this area of Burgundy. 13%.


Gérard Mugneret Bourgogne Passetoutgrain 2004 (Burgundy, France)
15/20
Sourced from the Wine Society, this is the typical Passetoutgrain blended Gamay and Pinot Noir. Light, brick red rim. Light, red fruit and a little floral; open and rather earthy pinot rusticity underlying this. Thin on the palate with fair acidity. Little tannin. This is not at all serious, but is enjoyable. Best suited to a summers day as a lightly-chilled easy-drinker with a good sized dish of the local fayre.


Domaine de la Chevalerie ‘Chevalerie’ 2001 (Bourgueil, Touraine)
16.5-17/20
Very open on the nose. Tea leaves, cedar. Rather aristocratic in nature (ironic given Chinon was always taken to be so, with Bourgueil the rustic relative). Developed and mature. Tannins are now delicate, unassuming but there remains a core of fruit matched by ample acidity albeit it in a lighter than usual style. Delicate and lasting finish. Textbook, and a testament to their winemaking skill given the vintage. Traditional Loire, this is looking to partner a good meal. Fine.

At some point I must type up my tasting notes from visiting this winery - remarkable, age-worthy traditional wines, that offer excellent value for money.


Cascina Orsolina ‘Caminata’ Barbera d’Asti 2003 (Piedmont, Italy)
15.5/20
Bought from the winery in 2006 and cellared at home. Bright red with a watery rim. Open nose, all primary red fruit and cherry. Fruit driven, tasty palate with typical Barbera (and northern Italian) high acidity. Palate is forward, still primary fruits. Light tannin. Approachable, generous and gluggable. Needs pizza and pasta. Drink now. 12.5%, which is surprising as it comes across more heady than this.


Cascina Orsolina ‘Bricco dei Cappuccini’ Superiore 2003 (Piedmont, Italy)
16(++)/20
Similarly bought from the winery in 2006 and cellared at home. As the ‘Bricco’ title suggests (Piemontese term for the vineyard summit, supposedly the best sites) this is their heavyweight Barbera Superiore, oak aged and a more serious proposition. Noctieably a little darker in colour than the Caminata, this has a deeper and more concentrated nose of cherry mixed with black spice. Some vanilla is still perceptible, but well integrated. The palate is full and round, though perhaps lacking in some of the depth that the lead-up suggests it will have. Nonetheless, this is intense and enjoyable. Leathery, balanced by red cherry fruit and neat acidity cutting right through. Perceptible tannin lines the mouth and a persistent finish. This has several more years ahead of it and it will be interesting to open another bottle in 3-4 years time. 13.5%.

NB. On second tasting this improved further, with dense bramble and cocoa characters coming through. Very rich.


Bricco Maiolica ‘Cumot’ Nebbiolo d’Alba 2003 (Piedmont, Italy)

‘Cumot’ is a Nebbiolo wine from this highly regarded winery. Characteristically light-cherry in colour, even lighter than a comparable pinot noir. Open nose redolent of the classical rose-water notes, though perhaps without much else. Palate has a soft start before a strong tannic bite hits. Light red fruit are to the fore in this well-balanced wine with a relatively short finish. It’s doubtful this wine isn’t going to offer more with further keeping. Drink now. 14%.

NB. On second tasting this had lost much of the rose-water character and seemed a little hollow. Drink up.


Produttori del Barbaresco, Barbaresco 2001 (Piedmont, Italy)

This Barbaresco ‘normale’ is a generic local wine from this most famous of Italian co-operative producers. It's produced every year, but in the best vintages the Cru vineyard components are vinified and sold separately.

Bought following a tasting at the winery in 2006. Colour is pale and innocent, nose a little subdued, not typical Nebbiolo, and then on tasting the tannins quietly creep up behind you and smash a baseball bat into your mouth. Gripping doesn’t come close – ripping would be a better way of describing it. This is not a criticism in any way; this is traditional characteristic of these wines from Barbaresco (and neighbouring Barolo). This is meat and tar; no international style crowd-pleaser, something much more true and serious. Good length with the typical bitter-cherry bite. It is difficult to see how this will develop from here. There is certainly enough stuffing in it to go on, but I can’t say I have a feel for which direction that will be in and whether it will actually improve. I suspect not. 14%. 16/20.

NB. On second tasting this had evolved slowly, and in the company of Italian meats the tannins were calmly subdued leaving a much more rounded wine. Not something to be tasted/drunk in isolation.

Saturday, 12 December 2009

Club dinner

Jamet - Cote-Rôtie 1998 (Northern Rhone, France)
Decanted an hour before dinner. Inky black, not really showing any age. Huge, open nose of quite fantastic depth, smokey, coffee, chocolate, dark spices. A companion thought it akin to liquid smelly socks! Gripping palate, surprisingly so, age had not softened the tannins yet. May never do! Quite four-square and volatile. Seemed to me to be a little old-fashioned in style – but this is not meant as a detrimental comment! Dark black fruits behind this, balanced with a medium finish. Not everyone’s cup of tea, but I very much enjoyed it as almost a caricature of itself – a fine, age-worthy syrah. I would think this will see out another decade, though certainly ready to drink now. 16.5+/20.

Warre’s 1977 vintage port
Decanted. Quite a show-stopper! I have tasted many, many different bottles of ’77 Warre’s over the past decade, and this was undoubtedly the best yet. This must have been perfectly stored in some very dark, deep cellars under Pall Mall as it was quite staggeringly youthful. Aged on the rim, but in the most part this wine had kept its colour with little of the orange-faded body I have seen in previous bottles. A little heady on the nose but quite classic. Remarkably full-bodied, with plenty of fruit remaining, although tannin clearly starting to fade. This was a splendid surprise and I can’t imagine there are too many bottles this good still in existence? This youthful wine could have passed for an ’85 in a blind tasting. 17/20.

Friday, 11 December 2009

Tasting Experiment

Tasting Experiment

Peter Lehman ‘The Futures’ 2006 (Barossa, Australia)
vs
Domaine les Goubert ‘Cuvée Florence’ 2003 (Gigondas, Southern Rhone, France)

The story of two wines decanted and drunk over three nights. A lesson in the difficulty associated with giving a note or score based on a single snap-shot tasting of a wine. Also a lesson in the difficulty of judging when to open, decant and serve a wine to see it at its best!

Night 1
Fillet steak

The Futures: inky dark, open nose redolent of a classic Barossa syrah-bruiser though perhaps showing a little more restraint than the styles of old. Dominant young red fruits and more than a touch of oak on the nose. Attractive but one dimensional for me. Palate similar – heavy in a good way; powerful, meaty, weighty. But not particularly complex. 16/20.

Cuvée Florence: showing a little age at the rim. Nose relatively closed, with some mature character typical of a ‘rural’ southern Rhone blend. Palate rather flat and thin, but otherwise well balanced. Angular – needs food to partner it. Good finish. 15.5/20.

Night 2
Sirloin steak

The Futures: opened up considerably, not necessarily different in character but just more of everything. Black spice coming through to the fore much more. Palate tasting broader, rounder but still lacking in a little complexity. 16(+)/20.

Cuvée Florence: What a metamorphosis! Having been seriously disappointed by this last night, it has changed almost out of recognition. Huge, opulent, complex nose. Spice, tobacco, and coffee all come across. The palate is broad and expansive, with seemingly much greater fruit that just wasn’t perceptible last night. This would easily pass for a middle-ranking Chateauneuf-du-Pape in a blind tasting such is the depth of character that has now evolved since opening. Trounces ‘The Futures’. 16.5-17/20.

Night 3
Beef joint and Yorkshire pudding

The Futures: Remarkably little change or development; this is certainly not tiring yet suggesting a long potential cellar life ahead of it. Similar note to last night.

Cuvée Florence: Developed a little further and perhaps faded a touch since the splendour of last night. Perhaps a few more years ahead of it for the bottles yet to be opened, but I would suggest keeping it much beyond then. For the scorched 2003 vintage this is a very good showing. I now look forward to tasting the 2001 still to be broached!